|
Summer 1996 |
|
Ed Oliver, MSc. - President of CPCS, Inc. Documentation Compliance Compliance in R&D was a featured topic at a recent PDA meeting in Chicago. With the merging of clinical and commercial supplies regulatory requirements, it is critical to make sure that quality and compliance are woven into the development process, instead of attempting to later mould development to meet compliance requirements. At the heart of this is the laboratory notebook. It not only forms the secure basis for patent protection, but it is also the foundation of good compliance habits. Critical notebook elements to observe are:
The development of departmental guidelines for notebook usage and standardized reporting formats encourages good compliance habits, which enable compliance to be a feature in all studies used on the road to creating drug products.
The new edition of the HPB's GMP Guidelines (4th Edition) contains significant amendments, which will be part of the 1997 inspection evaluations, namely;
For the 12 months following publication, no non-compliance ratings will be assigned based on deviations from the revised guidelines unless a health hazard is established. It is expected that manufacturers will develop validation master plans in the interim. It has been decided to phase out the use of Plant Master Files for compliance demonstration for foreign plants as of January 1, 1996. Manufacturers and importers are encouraged to obtain viable plant inspection reports from the relevant national authorities, if available.
Internal FDA reform measures reportedly being discussed would, if enacted, provide for increased regulatory flexibility for biotech manufacturing and enable closer integration of CBER and CDER regulations. However, despite broad Congressional support for Food and Drug Administration reform, the odds for FDA reform measures passing in this election year appear to be only 50/50. Critics of the FDA continue to say that approval takes too long; citing that it now takes 15 years to get a new drug to market in the United States, compared to six years in the mid 1960s, with the result that other countries benefit first from medical innovations developed by U.S. companies. Between 1987 and 1993, close to 75% of the drugs approved by the FDA first received regulatory approval in other countries. The bill before the House has a provision which allows medical devices and products to be reviewed by a certified third party (as is widely used in Europe), rather than the FDA. An idea yet to be endorsed by FDA management. Companies could save money under the plan because it would take less time to test products for marketability. Two other legislative issues important to biotechnology - tax credit for research and development and capital gains tax reduction - have suffered in the battle over a balanced federal budget. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH)
Requires real time, real temperature studies
Analysis of the Expression Construct in cells used for the Production of r-DNA Derived Protein Products (Q5B); Step 4:
Validated limits of detection for variants.
Viral Safety Evaluation (Q5A); Step 2
Virus inactivation/removal validation Unprocessed bulk virus testing
Cell Substrates (Q5D); Step 2
Specifications for biotechnological Products (New); Step 1;
|
© 1997 CPCS, Inc. |